Mobilizing P2P Diffusion for New Agricultural Practices: Experimental Evidence from Bangladesh
No AccessAgricultureNov 2021
This paper works by using a randomized controlled experiment in which farmers properly trained on a new rice cultivation process instruct two other farmers. The effects show that the intervention will increase yields and farm revenue between dealt with farmers. Instructor-trainees are powerful at spreading expertise and inducing adoption relative to just teaching. Incentivizing trainer-trainees enhances expertise transmission but not adoption. Matching trainer-trainees with farmers who record them as part models does not make improvements to expertise transmission and might damage adoption. Using mediation assessment, the examine finds that the expertise of the trainer-trainee is correlated with that of their college students, reliable with expertise transmission. The paper also finds that programs of rice intensification (SRI) expertise predicts adoption of some SRI techniques, and that adoption by trainer-trainees predicts adoption by their college students, suggesting that college students observe the illustration of their trainer. With price-gain estimates of social returns in extra of 100 %, explicitly mobilizing peer-to-peer (P2P) transmission of expertise seems a price-powerful way of inducing the adoption of new lucrative agricultural techniques.
References
- . 2020. “Marching Frictions and Distorted Beliefs: Evidence from a Occupation Fall short Experiment.” Office of Economics, Oxford College (mimeo). Google Scholar
- . 2009. “Performing Fantastic or Performing Well? Picture Motivation and Financial Incentives in Behaving Prosocially.” American Economic Assessment ninety nine (1): 544–55. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
- . 2007. “Incentives for Administrators and Inequality between Personnel: Evidence from a Organization-Level Experiment.” Quarterly Journal of Economics 122 (two): 729–73. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
- . 2010. “Social Incentives in the Office.” Assessment of Economic Scientific tests 77 (two): 417–58. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
- . 2017. “Labor Marketplaces and Poverty in Village Economies.” Quarterly Journal of Economics 132 (two): 811–70. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
- . 2006. “Social Networks and Technological innovation Adoption in Northern Mozambique.” Economic Journal 116 (514): 869–902. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
- . 2013. “The Diffusion of Microfinance.” Science 341 (6144): 1236598-1–7. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
- . 2020. “The Consequences of Exposure Intensity on Technological innovation Adoption and Gains: Experimental Evidence from Bangladesh on the Procedure of Rice Intensification.” Operating Paper, Cornell College. Google Scholar
- . 2004. “Greater Technological innovation, Greater Plots, or Greater Farmers? Figuring out Changes in Efficiency and Chance between Malagasy Rice Farmers.” American Journal of Agricultural Economics 86 (four): 869–88. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
- . Forthcoming. “Can Community Idea-Based Targeting Boost Technological innovation Adoption?” American Economic Assessment. Google Scholar
- . 2019. “Social Discovering and Incentives for Experimentation and Interaction.” Assessment of Economic Scientific tests 86 (3): 976–1009. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
- . 2019. “Motivating Knowledge Agents: Can Incentive Pay Defeat Social Distance?” Economic Journal 129 (617): 110–42. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
- . 2013. “Does Management Matter? Evidence from India.” Quarterly Journal of Economics 128 (1): 1–51. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
- . 2009. “Neighbourhood Peer Consequences in Secondary College Enrollment Conclusions.” Assessment of Economics and Stats ninety one (four): 695–716. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
- . 2013. “Social Networks and the Determination to Insure.” American Economic Journal: Applied Economics seven (two): 81–108. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
- . 2017. “Educating Personalized Initiative Beats Traditional Education in Boosting Tiny Corporations in West Africa.” Science 357 (6357): 1287–90. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
- . 2014. “Measuring the Consequences of Interventions in BRAC, and How This Has Driven ‘Development’.” Journal of Progress Success 6 (four): 407–24. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
- . 2010. “Discovering about a New Technological innovation: Pineapple in Ghana.” American Economic Assessment 100 (1): 35–69. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
- . 2012. “Incentives Get the job done: Obtaining Instructors to Occur to College.” American Economic Assessment 102 (four): 1241–78. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
- . 2011. “Nudging Farmers to Use Fertilizer: Idea and Experimental Evidence from Kenya.” American Economic Assessment 101 (6): 2350–90. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
- . 2020. “Can Referral Strengthen Targeting? Evidence from an Agricultural Education Experiment.” Journal of Progress Economics a hundred and forty four: 102436. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
- . 2018. “Networks and Producing Corporations in Africa: Benefits from a Randomized Field Experiment.” World Lender Economic Assessment 32 (3): 656–75. AbstractGoogle Scholar
- . 1995. “Discovering by Performing and Discovering from Others: Human Money and Technical Modify in Agriculture.” Journal of Political Financial system, 103 (6): 1176–209. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
- . 2013. “Facts Transmission in Irrigation Technological innovation Adoption and Diffusion: Social Discovering, Extension Solutions, and Spatial Consequences.” American Journal of Agricultural Economics 96 (1): 328–44. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
- . 2006. “Placing Behavioral Economics to Get the job done: Testing for Gift Exchange in Labor Marketplaces Using Field Experiments.” Econometrica 74 (5): 1365–84. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
- . 2000. “Pay More than enough or You should not Pay at All.” Quarterly Journal of Economics, 115 (3): 791–810. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
- . 2018. “Efficiency in Piece-Rate Labor Marketplaces: Evidence from Rural Malawi.” Journal of Progress Economics 131: 42–61. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
- 2018. “Why Do Corporations Employ the service of Using Referrals? Evidence from Bangladeshi Garment Factories.” Journal of Political Financial system, 126 (four): 1691–746. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
- . 1952. “A Generalization of Sampling without the need of Alternative from a Finite Universe.” Journal of the American Statistical Affiliation 47 (260): 663–85. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
- . 2019. “Agricultural Microcredit for Tenant Farmers: Evidence from a Field Experiment in Bangladesh.” American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 101 (3): 692–709. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
- . 2009. “Current Developments in the Econometrics of Application Evaluation.” Journal of Economic Literature 47 (1): 5–86. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
- . 2018. “Can General public Recognition Backfire? Field Experimental Evidence on the Retention and Overall performance of Volunteers with Heterogeneous Social-Picture Considerations.” Operating Paper, Monash College. Google Scholar
- . 2004. “Validation of Procedure of Rice Intensification (SRI) Practice by Spacing, Seedling Age and Drinking water Management.” Bangladesh Agronomy Journal ten (1&two): 13–21. Google Scholar
- . 2005. “Validation of the Procedure of Rice Intensification (SRI) in Bangladesh.” Field Crops Research 93 (two&3): 281–92. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
- 2002. “Evaluating the Effect of Instructors? Team Overall performance Incentives on Pupil Achievement.” Journal of Political Financial system one hundred ten (6): 1286–317. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
- . 2010. “The Effect of Fiscal Benefits on Pupils. Achievement: Evidence from a Randomized Experiment.” Journal of the European Economic Affiliation 8 (6): 1243–65. Google Scholar
- . 2015. “Discovering about New Technologies by Social Networks: Experimental Evidence on Non-Traditional Stoves in Rural Bangladesh.” Internet marketing Science 34 (four): 480–99. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
- . 2006. “The Complicated Dynamics of Smallholder Technological innovation Adoption: The Scenario of SRI in Madagascar.” Agricultural Economics 35 (3): 373–88. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
- . 2011. “Instructor Overall performance Pay: Experimental Evidence from India.” Journal of Political Financial system 19 (1): 39–77. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
- . 2012. “Determinants of Technological innovation Adoption: Peer Consequences in Menstrual Cup Acquire-Up.” Journal of the European Economic Affiliation ten (6): 1263–93. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
- . 2007. “Efficiency Impacts of the Procedure of Rice Intensification (SRI): A Scenario Examine in West Bengal, India.” Agricultural Drinking water Management 87 (1): 55–60. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
- . 2002. “A Assessment of Agricultural Research Difficulties Elevated by the Procedure of Rice Intensification (SRI) from Madagascar: Possibilities for Bettering Farming Devices for Resource-Very poor Farmers.” Agricultural Devices seventy one (3): 249–74. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
- . 2014. “The Procedure of Rice Intensification and Its Impacts on House Profits and Boy or girl Education: Evidence from Rural Indonesia.” American Journal of Agricultural Economics 96 (1): 269–89. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
- . 2018. “NGOs and the Success of Interventions.” UNU Broader Operating Paper 2018/fifty nine. Google Scholar
